Page 196 - anf1995elsmere_deis
P. 196

Of these nine alternative locations, four were originally considered in the Puente Hills
                Landfill EIR. Five new sites were considered in the Spadra Landfill EIR. These five new
                                                                                                                   Q
                alternative locations, combined with the 96 previously listed sites, comprise the 101 sites
                considered in the PEIR. The five new locations considered in the Spadra Landfill EIR were
                Spadra, San Dimas Canyon, Englewild Canyon, Gail Canyon, and Burbank Canyon (Canyons
                453e, 502, 510 and 512, respectively, on Table 8).       All nine sites passed the first two
                screening tests applied by the Districts and were comparatively evaluated. Table 9 shows
                the ratings based on the comparative evaluation of criteria contained in Table 2. The
                Spadra Landfill was identified as the best landfill location for the wasteshed among the nine
                locations. The individual reviews of all nine alternative locations are provided in Appendix
                B.


                d.                                        Site Study . ..

                In the 1987 Study the Districts evaluated 98 alternative locations, that included reevaluation
                of all of the above locations, as well as six additional alternative locations. Three of the
                alternatives originally evaluated were existing landfills, Mission Canyon, Puente Hills and
                Spadra and they were not reevaluated in the 1987 study.          The six additional locations
                included the following: Blind Canyon, Browns Canyon, Elsmere Canyon, La Tuna Canyon,
                Towsley Canyon and Toyon Canyon 1].          These additional locations were added at the
                request of private individuals or of one of the three agencies providing solid waste
                management service within the Los Angeles metropolitan area (i.e. City, County or
                Sanitation Districts). The total number of sites brought forward in the 1987 Study was 101
                sites.

                The Districts 1987 Study examined all 101 alternative locations as possible sites for a new
                regional landfill to serve the Los Angeles metropolitan area. As previously noted, these
                locations are listed in Appendix A along with and the Districts’ evaluation shown of the sites
                from the 1987 Study.      In the 1987 evaluation by the Districts, several of the original
                evaluations were modified and 91 of the originallolaltemative locations were identified
                as having critical deficiencies that precluded them from being considered as a regional
                landfill site. The remaining ten locations that the Districts determined were suitable for
                comparative evaluation as regional landfill sites in 1987 are shown in Figure 6.

                In summary, 91 alternative locations were eliminated from further review based on critical
                deficiencies in the 1987 Preliminary Alternative Site Study.         No additional data were
                published beyond the summary information contained in Appendix A as part of the 1987
                Study. The 1987 Study identified the following ten sites as potential alternative locations
                for a regional landfill to be located within the Los Angeles metropolitan area (see Figure
                6):

                1.     Blind Canyon
                2.     Browns Canyon
                3.     Elsmere Canyon


                                                              22
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201