Page 10 - mcelhoes2017
P. 10
LIST OF FIGURES
1. The mountain ranges and rivers of the study area……………………………………………...4
2. Approximate areas with known vessel ceramics in California…………………………………5
3. Locations of deposits with ceramics in Los Angeles and Orange Counties……………………7
4. Rogers’s western groups Yuman and Shoshonean pottery shapes…………………………....20
5. Dates of ceramic deposits………………………………………………………………….….23
6. Locations of deposits in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California that are included in
this study.......………………………………………………....…………………….…....36
7. Measurements taken on sherds for the Two-Curvature Method…………………………........48
8. Profile and axial curvature for the Two-Curvature Method……………………………..........49
9. Rim forms………………………………………………………………………………...…...50
10. Lip shape………………………………………………………………………………….….50
11. Lip lateralization………………………………………………………………………….….50
12. Thin-section diagram…………………………………………………………………….…..52
13. Spatial model of GIS steps for predictive model…………………………………………….59
14. Histogram of thickness for southern California deposit sherds……………………………...62
15. Box-and-whisker plot of thickness for southern California deposit sherds………………….63
16. Spatial distribution of thickness for ceramic deposits……………………………………….63
17. Graph of profile and axial curvature calculated from the Two-Curvature Method…….........64
18. Box-and-whisker plot of orifice diameter from rim sherds………………………………….67
19. Histogram of orifice diameter and rim form shape for southern California deposit sherds…68
20. Scatterplot of thickness, orifice diameter, and inferred function(s) for southern California
deposit sherds………........……………………………………………………………….68
21. Spatial distribution of orifice diameters and inferred vessel function(s)…….………………69
viii
