Page 636 - northlakehills_deir_0517
P. 636

NorthLake Specific Plan
                                                                                            Draft Supplemental EIR

               It  should  be  noted  that  the  vibration  level  that  causes  a  potential  for structural  damage  from
               blasting is not the same as the structural damage potential data shown in Table 5.10-10. Data
               from blasting research shows that no residential damage is likely to occur at blast vibration levels
               less than 2.0 ppv in/sec (Caltrans 2013b).

               U.S. Bureau of Mines

               The U. S Bureau of Mines (USBM) 1980 publication, “Structure Response and Damage Produced
               by Ground Vibration From Surface Mine Blasting” includes the following conclusions (Caltrans
               2013b):

                   •  The  potential  for  damage  to  residential  structures  is  greater  with  low-frequency  blast
                       vibration (below 40 Hz) than with high frequency blast vibration (40 Hz and above).
                   •  The type of residential construction is a factor in the vibration amplitude required to cause
                       damage
                   •  For low-frequency blast vibration, a limit of 0.75 in/sec ppv for modern drywall construction
                       and 0.50 in/sec ppv for older plaster-on-lath construction was proposed. For frequencies
                       above 40 Hz, a limit of 2.0 in/sec ppv for all types of construction was proposed

               Caltrans Guidance

               Human response to blast vibration and air overpressures from blasting is difficult to quantify.
               Ground vibration and air overpressures can be felt at levels that are well below those required to
               produce any damage to structures. The duration of the event has an effect on human response,
               as does the frequency. Events are of short duration, 1–2 seconds, for millisecond-delayed blasts.
               Typically, the longer the event and the higher the frequency, the more adverse the effect on
               human  response.  Factors  such  as  frequency  of  occurrence,  fright  or  “startle  factor,”  level  of
               personal activity at the time of the event, health of the individual, time of day, orientation of the
               individual (standing up or lying down), the perceived importance of the blasting operation, and
               other political and economic considerations also affect human response (Caltrans 2013b).

               Although the duration of an event affects human response, some researchers have found that
               fewer blasts of a longer duration are preferable to many blasts with shorter durations. There would
               be fewer times of perceived disturbance. Fixed locations such as quarries may be able to take
               advantage  of  this.  Construction  projects,  however,  usually  have  constraints  such  as  smaller
               volumes  of  material  to  be  blasted  and  sequence  of  the  work  that  would  preclude  this.
               Table 5.10-13, Human Response to Blasting Ground Vibration and Air Overpressure, indicates
               the average human response to vibration and air overpressures that may be anticipated when the
               person is at rest, situated in a quiet surrounding.

                                                      TABLE 5.10-13
                                HUMAN RESPONSE TO BLASTING GROUND VIBRATION
                                                AND AIR OVERPRESSURE

                                 Average Human Response             PPV (in/sec)         Airblast (dB)
                     Barely to distinctly perceptible                0.02–0.10              50–70
                     Distinctly to strongly perceptible              0.10–0.50              70–90
                     Strongly perceptible to mildly unpleasant       0.50–1.00              90–120
                     Mildly to distinctly unpleasant                 1.00–2.00             120–140
                     Distinctly unpleasant to intolerable            2.00–10.00            140–170
                     Source: Caltrans 2013b.

               R:\Projects\OC\WCP_Woodrid\J0001\Draft EIR\5.10 Noise-042617.docx   5.10-32               Noise
   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641