Page 865 - tesoro_sdeir0218
P. 865

Tesoro del Valle (Phases A, B, C)
                                                                                            Draft Supplemental EIR

               was A-2-2, the current zoning is R-1 and there are no areas that are currently being used for
               agricultural purposes. The project is not located in a forest land, timberland, or area zoned for
               timberland  production.  Consistent  with  the  proposed  Project,  potential  impacts  to
               agriculture/forest resources with the 1999 Tract Map Alternative would be considered less than
               significant. No mitigation is required.


               Air Quality

               The 1999 Tract Map Alternative would require more earthwork compared to the proposed Project
               due to the larger development footprint. As with the proposed project, the required earthwork (cut
               and fill) would balance on-site and the import or export of materials would not be required. Due to
               the increase in earthwork and a related increase in the duration of construction associated with
               mass grading operations, it is expected that impacts related to the combined building construction
               plus operational activities emissions for nitrogen oxides (NOx) would continue to occur. However,
               these impacts would be mitigated to a level considered less than significant as with the proposed
               Project. Trip generation would be reduced due to the reduction in dwelling units and would reduce
               long-term emissions. Consistent with the proposed Project, long-term emissions would be less
               than significant.

               Biological Resources

               The 1999 Tract Map Alternative would increase the development area of the Project site, resulting
               in  greater  impacts  related  to  biological  resources  as  the  proposed  Project  due  to  a  larger
               development  footprint.  This  alternative  would  increase  the  development  footprint  by
               approximately 366.3 acres when compared to the proposed Project. The areas that would be
               developed  as  part  of  the  1999  Tract  Map  Alternative  contain  significant  biological  resources
               including  additional  oak  trees,  therefore,  development  under  this  alternative  would  result  in
               greater impacts related to biological resources than what is anticipated to be impacted by the
               proposed Project. Consistent with the proposed Project, these impacts would be reduced to less
               than significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures identified in Section 5.4.

               Cultural Resources

               The 1999 Tract Map Alternative would expand the development area of the Project site by 366.3
               acres, resulting in an increase in grading and ground disturbance. As addressed in Section 5.5 of
               this Draft EIR, the site contains no known archaeological resources. Consistent with the proposed
               Project, excavation in native soils always has the potential to uncover unknown archaeological
               resources and human remains and there is no way to tell if the increase in development area
               would  also  increase  impacts.  Therefore,  as  with  the  proposed  project,  potential  impacts  to
               archaeological resources and human remains under this alternative can be mitigated to a level
               considered less than significant.

               As described in Section 5.5, the project site is underlain by the Saugus Formation, and to a lesser
               extent,  the  Castaic  Formation,  both  of  which  are  determined  to  be  of  high  paleontological
               sensitivity.  However,  similar  to  the  proposed  project,  the  high  paleontological  sensitivity  with
               development of this alternative would continue to exist and there is no way to tell if the increase
               in  development  area  would  increase  direct  impacts  to  paleontological  resources.  Therefore,
               consistent with the proposed Project, these impacts would be reduced to less than significant
               levels with implementation of identified mitigation measures.






               R:\Projects\BLC\3BLC000100\Draft EIR\6.0 Alternatives.docx   6-14   Alternatives to the Proposed Project
   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870