Page 892 - tesoro_sdeir0218
P. 892

Tesoro del Valle (Phases A, B, C)
                                                                                            Draft Supplemental EIR

               San Francisquito Canyon Road. Therefore, impacts would be less than those identified for the
               proposed Project and the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impacts would be avoided.

               Agriculture/Forest

               As  described  in  Section  5.2  of  this  Draft  EIR,  no  portion  of  the  project  site  is  designated  as
               Prime or Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Phases B and C were entirely
               zoned  A-2-2,  the  current  zoning  is  largely  R-1,  except  the  northeastern  portion  which  is  still
               zoned A-2-2. Said areas are vacant and are not currently being used for agricultural purposes.
               The project is not located in a forest land, timberland, or zoned timberland production area. As
               with the proposed Project, potential impacts to agriculture/forest resources would be considered
               less than significant. Impacts associated with the Modified 2012 Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan
               Alternative would be the same as with the proposed Project.

               Air Quality

               The  Modified  2012  Santa  Clarita  Valley  Area  Plan  Alternative  would  require  less  earthwork
               compared to the proposed Project due to the decreased development footprint (79.8 acres versus
               393.6 acres). It is assumed that all earthwork would be balanced on-site. As with the proposed
               Project, short- and long-term impacts would be subject to regulatory requirements set forth by the
               South Coast Air Quality Management District as well as additional mitigation measures which
               would  reduce  impacts  to  a  level  considered  less  than  significant.  Trip  generation  would  be
               reduced due to the reduction in dwelling units (520 versus 820) and would result in reduced long-
               term emissions when compared to the proposed Project. Impacts associated with the Modified
               2012 Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan Alternative would be reduced in comparison to the proposed
               Project.

               Biological Resources


               The Modified 2012 Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan Alternative would reduce the development area
               of the Project site (79.8 acres versus 393.6 acres), resulting in fewer impacts related to biological
               resources as compared to the proposed Project due to a smaller development footprint. The
               Modified 2012 Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan Alternative development area contains significant
               biological  resources,  therefore,  impacts  would  occur.  However,  consistent  with  the  proposed
               Project, these impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of
               mitigation measures identified in Section 5.4.

               Cultural Resources

               The Modified 2012 Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan Alternative would reduce the development area
               of the Project site, resulting in a reduction in grading and ground disturbance. As addressed in
               Section 5.5 of this Draft EIR, the site contains no known archaeological resources. Consistent
               with the proposed Project, excavation in native soils always has the potential to uncover unknown
               archaeological  resources  and  human  remains  even  though  the  development  area  would  be
               smaller. Therefore, as with the proposed Project, potential impacts to archaeological resources
               and  human  remains  under  this  alternative  can  be  mitigated  to  a  level  considered  less  than
               significant.

               As described in Section 5.5, the project site is underlain by the Saugus Formation, and to a lesser
               extent,  the  Castaic  Formation,  both  of  which  are  determined  to  be  of  high  paleontological
               sensitivity.  However,  similar  to  the  proposed  Project,  the  high  paleontological  sensitivity  with
               development of this alternative would continue to exist even though the development area would



               R:\Projects\BLC\3BLC000100\Draft EIR\6.0 Alternatives.docx   6-37   Alternatives to the Proposed Project
   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897