Page 893 - trc_centennial_deir201705
P. 893

5.7 Biological Resources

               and stature typical of condor nests. As the condor population increases, the Project site may
               receive flyovers by California condors; however, based upon known condor movements,
               flyovers would likely be rare events. Possibly as a result of limited big-game hunting or
               reduced wind currents and thermals, the Centennial Project site appears not to have the
               essential  elements  needed  to  attract  condors  (Snyder  and  Snyder  2000;  Bloom  2009).
               Unreliable seasonal winds and/or thermals may be the reason for the area’s limited use by
               past and present condors.

               In the Project region, condors have been reported from the Sespe Reserve, Tejon Ranch, and
               Redrock Mountain (CDFW 2015a); On the Project site, a few hundred records,4 representing
               high flying birds, exist including one landing (CDFW 2015a; Bloom 2009). Relative to the
               plethora of observation data that have been gathered for this species over the past 20 years,
               occurrence on the Project site is extremely rare. The thousands of other records for this
               species in the region are almost entirely located more than ten miles from the site. A study
               of all  available  California condor  data gathered  by the USFWS in  recent years shows a
               preference for several high elevation areas in the region and an obvious avoidance of the
               low-lying western Antelope Valley, including the Project site (Bloom 2009). The California
               condor is not expected to occur on site for nesting or foraging.

               On September 24, 1976, the USFWS designated Critical Habitat for the condor consisting of
               9 areas that encompass approximately 600,000 acres (USFWS 1976). These areas occur in
               the  following  counties:  Tulare,  San  Luis  Obispo,  Ventura,  Kern, Santa Barbara,  and  Los
               Angeles.  The  Sespe-Piru,  Matilija,  Sisquoc-San  Rafael,  and  Hi  Mountain-Beartrap  condor
               areas were considered critical for nesting and related year-long activity and the Mt. Pinos
               and Blue Ridge condor areas were considered critical for roosting. Tejon Ranch, Kern County
               rangelands, and Tulare  County rangelands  were  considered  important  for  feeding  and
               related activities. Tejon Ranch and the Bitter Creek Wildlife Refuge were considered to be
               important because they contained the only significant feeding habitat remaining in close
               proximity  to  the  Sespe-Piru  condor  nesting  area  (USFWS  1976).  The Project  site  is  not
               located within designated Critical Habitat for this species.

               Bald Eagle

               The bald eagle was a federally listed Endangered species until 2007 when USFWS removed
               the bald eagle from the federal Endangered species list (USFWS 2007b). It does remain a
               California State-listed  Endangered and California  Fully Protected  species;  and  it  is  also
               protected by the Federal Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940 and the Migratory Bird Treaty
               Act of 1918 (U.S. Congress 1994, 2005). Several recovery plans from 1982 to 1990 were used
               to help the bald eagle populations recover. California is located within the Pacific Recovery
               Plan approved in 1986. Currently, there is no Critical Habitat designated for this species. Bald
               eagles usually nest in trees near water, but are known to nest on cliffs and are rarely on the
               ground. Fish are the major component of its diet, but waterfowl, gulls, and carrion are also
               eaten. The species may also use prairies if adequate food is available. Bald eagles frequent
               estuaries,  large  lakes,  reservoirs,  major  rivers,  and  some  seacoast  habitats.  Conditions
               marginally suitable for nesting and foraging are present on the Project site. The bald eagle


               4    It is important to note that hundreds of records does not equate to hundreds of condors. Rather, multiple data points
                   for one bird would be recorded as it flew over the site.

               R:\Projects\PAS\CEN\000306\Draft EIR\5.7 Bio_051117.docx   5.7-120             Centennial Project
                                                                                                     Draft EIR
   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898