Page 928 - trc_centennial_deir201705
P. 928

5.7 Biological Resources

               2001 (see Table 5.7-2). Although, not documented officially in CNDDB records, the western
               pond  turtle  has  been  observed  incidentally  off-site  at  Quail  Lake,  so  it  is  possible  that
               individuals  may  occur  on  the Project  site for  nesting.  One  two-striped  garter snake  was
               observed outside the Project’s impact footprint in the northwestern portion of the Project
               site. Based on an absence of official records, if Quail Lake in fact does support a population
               of western pond turtle, the population is expected to be small. The two-stripe garter snake
               is a highly aquatic species that depends on a perennial water source. Project impacts would
               result in the loss of a small amount of potentially suitable western pond turtle nesting habitat
               available to a population that may persist at Quail Lake. For both these species, the amount
               of potentially suitable habitat on the Project site is very limited and would only amount to a
               couple of acres at most. Project impacts to this limited potentially suitable habitat for both
               species is not expected to have a substantial impact on regional populations. Therefore, the
               loss of limited and isolated cattle pond features and the grassland/scrub habitat immediately
               adjacent to Quail Lake that would occur with Project implementation would be considered
               adverse, but less than significant for the western pond turtle and two-striped garter snake.
               The loss of individuals for these two species, however, may be considered significant under
               Section 15380 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Implementation of MM 7-2 through MM 7-4
               requiring avoidance of impacts outside disturbance limits, pre-construction surveys, and
               biological  monitoring  (including  relocation  of  individuals  from the Project’s impact
               footprint) would reduce the impact to less than significant.

               The  silvery  legless  lizard  and  coast  horned  lizard  were  both  observed  during  multiple
               surveys performed for reptiles between March 2000 and June 2006 (see Table 5.7-2). One
               legless lizard was observed at the far western edge of the Project site. Horned lizards were
               observed  in  several  site  drainages,  primarily  in  the  eastern  portions  of  the  Project  site.
               Suitable and potentially suitable habitat for these two species generally may occur within
               grassland, scrub, riparian, and oak woodland habitat types. The legless lizard requires a high
               soil moisture content, while the coast horned lizard can tolerate dryer habitats. Areas on the
               Project site with high soil moisture content are limited and the legless lizard is expected to
               occur mainly in the oak woodland and riparian habitats where the soil moisture content is
               higher due to factors such as plant cover and leaf litter. The coast horned lizard has been
               detected mainly in the dry, sandy, washes within the grassland and scrub habitats in the
               eastern  portion  of  the  project  site.  Based  on  these  vegetation  types  and  the  habitat
               requirements of these species, potentially suitable habitat on the Project site is expected to
               be scattered patchy in distribution, amounting to no more than 10% of the total area. Of the
               roughly 7,000 acres impacted by the Project, it is estimated that no more than 700 acres of
               potentially suitable habitat occurs for both species, though is likely much less for the legless
               lizard. These two species are expected to be relatively abundant in the region; therefore, the
               loss  of  roughly  700  acres  associated  with  Project  implementation  would  be  considered
               adverse, but less than significant for the silvery legless lizard and coast horned lizard and no
               mitigation is required. Even though impacts would be less than significant, implementation
               of MM 7-2 through MM 7-4 requiring avoidance of impacts outside disturbance limits, pre-
               construction surveys, and biological monitoring (including relocation of individuals from the
               Project’s impact footprint) if detected would further help these species.






               R:\Projects\PAS\CEN\000306\Draft EIR\5.7 Bio_051117.docx   5.7-147             Centennial Project
                                                                                                     Draft EIR
   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933