Page 962 - trc_centennial_deir201705
P. 962

5.7 Biological Resources

               Threshold 7-7         Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted state,
                                     regional, or local habitat conservation plan?


               On-Site Impacts

               As  discussed  previously,  the  Tejon  Ranch  Company  has  received  a permit  pursuant to
               Section 10(a)(1)(B) of FESA (16 USC Sections 1531–1544) for incidental take of the Covered
               Species  and  to  meet  the  requirements  for  this  permit,  has  developed  a  multiple  species
               habitat conservation plan (MSHCP). This MSHCP was approved in April 2013.

               The TU MSHCP’s Covered Lands propose to encompass 141,886 acres of the 270,365-acre
               Ranch. The TU MSHCP focuses on the California condor and other species of the montane
               upland communities. The communities on the Centennial Project site, which is primarily in
               a valley area, do not fit into the same criteria for coverage. Regardless, many of the same
               species  occur  in  the  foothills  and  lowland  areas, including  on  the  Centennial  site.  These
               species  will  mutually  benefit  from  the  MSHCP  and  the  Centennial  Mitigation  Preserve
               Program.

               There are no other approved or proposed habitat conservation plans near the site or that
               cover  the  Project  site.  There  would,  therefore,  be  no  conflict  with the provisions  of an
               adopted  Habitat  Conservation  Plan,  Natural  Community  Conservation  Plan,  or  other
               approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

               Off-Site Impacts


               There are no other approved or proposed habitat conservation plans near the site or that
               cover  the  Project  site.  There  would,  therefore,  be  no  conflict  with the provisions  of an
               adopted  Habitat  Conservation  Plan,  Natural  Community  Conservation  Plan,  or  other
               approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

               Impact Summary:  There would be no impact due to habitat conservation plans (HCPs) or
                                     natural community conservation plans (NCCPs) as there are no active
                                     HCPs or NCCPs for the Project site. The Project site is outside the TU
                                     MSHCP boundaries, therefore impacts are not expected to occur.


               5.7.7  MITIGATION MEASURES

               MM 7-1         Prior  to  issuance  of  grading  permits  in  areas  of  the  Project  site  that  may
                              disturb  California  androsace,  crownscale,  round-leaved  filaree, Mojave
                              spineflower,  sylvan  scorzonella,  or  adobe  yampah  populations,  focused
                              surveys of mitigation lands shall have been completed to confirm compliance
                              with the 2:1 mitigation ratio for the California androsace, crownscale, round-
                              leaved  filaree,  Mojave  spineflower,  sylvan  scorzonella,  and  adobe  yampah.
                              Surveys will be conducted in accordance with current California Native Plant
                              Society (CNPS) protocol and will occur during the appropriate time of year.
                              The  Survey  Report  shall  be  submitted  to  the  County  and  the  California
                              Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for their review. In addition to rare


               R:\Projects\PAS\CEN\000306\Draft EIR\5.7 Bio_051117.docx   5.7-173             Centennial Project
                                                                                                     Draft EIR
   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967