Page 7 - gillibrand1991eis

COVERSHEET

FINAL ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT STATEMENT
GILLIBRAND SOLEDAD CANYON MINING OPERATIONS
ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST, CALIFORNIA

a. Responsible Aaency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Angeles National
Forest, California

b. Proposed Action: Gilli brand Soledad Canyon Mining Operations, Los Angeles County,
California

c. Inquiries on this document should be directed to:

Charles McDonald
Angeles National Forest
701 N. Santa Anita Avenue
Arcadia, California 91006
(818) 574-5257

d. Deslanatlon: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)

e. Abstract: In August 1989, the P.W. Gillibrand Company submitted a preliminary Plan of
Operations to the Forest Service for the development and production of the Soledad Canyon
Mining Project. In response, the Angeles Forest Supervisor directed the preparation of an

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA). This EIS analyzes effects and discloses the potential environmental
consequences of the proposed action, no action, and two alternatives. The proposed action

calls for the extraction of titanium ores and associated heavy minerals from the Proponent's
lode and placer claims in the Angeles National Forest, Los Angeles County. California. The
environmental analysis addresses the impacts of open-pit excavation, road construction, and
conveyor construction on specific sites within an 810-acre project boundary. The Proponent
expects to produce 400,000 tons of ilmenite per year at the peak of operations. This target

will cause 300 acres of site disturbance over a 10-year operations period. The public used the
scoping process to identify such issues as air quality, soils, water resources, biological
resources. cultural and paleontological resources, transportation, visual resources, noise,

recreational opportunities, land use, property values, and public health and safety. The
preparers of the EIS evaluated these issues to formulate mitigation measures that will reduce
environmental impacts to a non-significant level. The Proponent has incorporated these
mitigation measures and other applicable regulatory requirements into a final Plan of

Operations for the project (see Appendix C, separately bound).

iii