Page 16 - sandcanyonplaza_deir0317
P. 16

1. Introduction                                                            1.2 – Scope and Content


             The Project would include grading approximately 2.2 million cubic yards of cut and fill balanced
             on-site. Additional remedial grading (850,000 cubic yards) would be necessary to accommodate the
             Project.

             A Project EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
             (CEQA), the state guidelines for the implementation of CEQA, and applicable City of Santa Clarita
             adopting procedures for implementation of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, including §15124
             (Project EIRs) and §15120 through §15131. This EIR identifies and discusses potential Project-
             specific and cumulative environmental impacts that may occur if the Project is implemented. The

             intent of this EIR is to: 1) be an informational document that serves to inform public agency
             decision makers and the general public of the potential environmental impacts of a project,
             2) identify possible ways to minimize or avoid any potential significant impacts either through
             mitigation or the adoption of alternatives, and 3) disclose to the public required agency approvals.

             The principal use of an EIR is to provide input and information to the comprehensive planning
             analysis. Given the important role of the EIR in this planning and decision-making process, it is
             important that the information presented in the EIR be factual, adequate, and complete. The
             standards for adequacy of an EIR, defined in §15151 of the CEQA Guidelines, are as follows:

                      An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide
                      decision-makers with information which enables them to make a decision which
                      intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the
                      environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the
                      sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible.
                      Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR
                      should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The
                      courts have looked not for perfection but for adequacy, completeness, and a good
                      faith effort at full disclosure.

             1.2  Scope and Content


             The City determined that an EIR should be prepared for Sand Canyon Plaza Mixed-Use Project. As
             a result, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared and circulated between April 30, 2015 and
             May 29, 2015 for the required 30-day review period. The purpose of the NOP was to solicit early
             comments from public agencies with expertise in subjects that will be discussed in the draft EIR.
             The NOP and written responses to the NOP are contained in Appendix 1 of this EIR. The City of
             Santa Clarita also held a scoping meeting on the Project to solicit oral and written comments from
             the public and public agencies. The public scoping meeting was held May 27, 2015. Comments
             received at the meeting are contained in Appendix 1 of this EIR.

             Topics requiring a detailed level of analysis evaluated in this EIR have been identified based upon
             the responses to both the NOP and a review of the Project by the City of Santa Clarita. The City




             Tebo Environmental Consulting, Inc.                  Sand Canyon Plaza Mixed-Use Project Draft EIR
             March 2017                                                                                   1-2
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21