Page 11 - skylineranch111317

PROJECT NUMBER 04-075-(5) FINDINGS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION NO. Page 5 of 6
RPPL2017009424

16. After consideration of the addendum to the EIR, together with any comments received
during the public review process, the Hearing Officer finds on the basis of the whole
record before the Hearing Officer that there is no substantial evidence the proposed
amendment will have a significant effect on the environment.

17. The Hearing Officer finds that the addendum reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the Hearing Officer, and approves the addendum.

BASED ON THE FOREGOING, THE HEARING OFFICER CONCLUDES:

REGARDING THE MINOR MODIFICATION OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:

A. That not more than one protest to the granting of the application was received within
the specified protest period;

B. That the burden of proof for the conditional use permit as modified has been
satisfied as required by Los Angeles County Code Section 22.56.040;

C. That approval of the application will not substantially alter or materially deviate from
the terms and conditions imposed in the granting of the previously approved
conditional use permit; and

D. That approval of the application is necessary to allow the reasonable operation and
use granted in the conditional use permit.

AND, THEREFORE, the information submitted by the applicant and presented at the
meeting substantiates the required findings for a minor modification to a conditional use
permit as set forth in Section 22.56.1630 County Code.

HEARING OFFICER ACTION:

1. Approves the addendum to the EIR and certifies that it has been completed in
compliance with CEQA and State and County guidelines related thereto.

2. Approves the requested Minor Modification to Conditional Use Permit 04-075, CUP
No. RPPL2017009424.

Attachments:
Original Findings and Conditions of Approval for CUP 04-075