Page 18 - doi_preservationbrief36
P. 18

DEVELOPING A PRESERVATION MAINTENANCE GUIDE



             In the past, there was rarely adequate record-keeping to   MM by providing a system for inventorying, assessing
             fully understand the ways a landscape was maintained.   conditions, and for providing corrective work
             This creates gaps in our research findings.  Today, we   recommendations for all site features.
             recognize that planning for ongoing maintenance and on-
             site applications should be documented-both routinely   Another approach to documenting maintenance and
             and comprehensively.  An annual work program or        recording changes over time is to develop a manual or
             calendar records the frequency of maintenance work on   computerized graphic information system.  Such a system
             built or natural landscape features.  It can also monitor   should have the capability to include plans and
             the age, health and vigor of vegetation.  For example, on-  photographs that would record a site's living collection of
             site assessments may document the presence of weeds,   plant materials. (Also see discussion of the use of
             pests, dead leaves, pale color, wilting, soil compaction-  photography under Preparing Existing Conditions Plans,
             all of which signal particular maintenance needs.  For   page 5.)  This may be achieved using a computer-aided
             built elements, the deterioration of paving or drainage   drafting program along with an integrated database
             systems may be noted and the need for repair or       management system.
             replacement indicated before hazards develop.  An     To guide immediate and ongoing maintenance, a
             overall maintenance program can assist in routine and   systematic and flexible approach has been developed by
             cyclic maintenance of the landscape and can also guide   the Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation.
             long term treatment projects.                         Working with National Park Service landscape managers
                                                                   and maintenance specialists, staff assemble information
             To help structure a comprehensive maintenance
             operation that is responsive to staff, budget, and    and make recommendations for the care of individual
             maintenance priorities, the National Park Service has   landscape features.
             developed two computer-driven programs for its own    Each landscape feature is inspected in the field to
             landscape resources.  A Maintenance Management        document existing conditions and identify field work
             Program (MM) is designed to assist maintenance        needed. Recommendations include maintenance
             managers in their efforts to plan, organize, and direct the   procedures that are sensitive to the integrity of the
             park maintenance system.  An Inventory and Condition   landscape.
             Assessment Program (lCAP) is designed to complement


                                                                               Statue 0/ U berty National MOllument
                                                                               FIELD INVENTORY. INSPECTION. AND WORK NEEDED
                                                                                                           ; jnl I
                                                                                                           I jl!~  H
                                                                               London PIanc: Tree 4-0-26  22·  ·2- ·.2 II  Larae scar from bnnch split. 5true·
                                                                                              rurally weak In:e,  mllO'f'e twancbcs
                                                                                              withdealy atbase, plIHIfOf'I'e-
                                                                                              pacement    )IS  x  P
                                                                               LonaonPllllll:Trcc4-O-273  - .2 r  -?n  leancr,crowdedbylariCfadjatelll
                                                                                           I   Ircc, ~vedeadbranehes
                                                                               LondonPlaneTrcc4-O-28  3-r:-3~ -~n  !::::!esdec.ay, rtmOyt lar'J't Mad   )IS.
                                                                               LondonPlanc:Trcc4'()'29  2,'r ,·2 r .~n :~~~'r=~::-:"d dtad
                                                                                              """"'"
                                                                               l.»rJJonPlancTrcc4-O-3Q  \ ,· 2  ·2- -211  goodcondilion. rtmOyt
                                                                                              walft'$prouts from trunk
                                                                               LondonPlanc:Trcc~J I  2.~ ·1· ·211.  faircondltiOl1.~ ltrUctural
                                                                                              pnmiJII.1 top or crown,  mnove
                                                                                              three dead broken branches   no  •
                                                                               LondonPlIneTree4-O-32  I ;-~  -2"  -I n  :::=~~COn(htJon. remo"eOM  no.
                                                                               London Plane Tree 4-0-33  3 - ~ .  li- .  I II.  :-=~ mnon  two of nVl!  lower
                                                                               London Plane Tree 4-0-34  I - ~  - 2 - - 2 II  rmJOn walmprouts rrom  trunk,
                                                                                              re-aJtdtadbrant:b spur
                                                                               London Plane Tree 4-Q.JS  2 - 2  - 2 - - 2 n  temOye WliIter5prootJ rrom  trunk,
                                                                                              nccd5structuralprunlnctbroulb-
                                                                                              oot
                                                                               London  Plane Tree 4416  333 - 3 - -3 n  in decline. dleback throughout,
                                                                                              sarety bazard, muon: aU dtad-
                                                                                              wood,  plan ror ~pl.acement   ",.  p
                                                                                              t......,..mbjcMCoIIIn.AFortupo.CPtppr.
                                                          Ri'~.               Figure B - Field Inventory, Inspection, and
                                                                              work needed: Within areas of the landscape,
             Figure A- Existing Conditions: A map of the existing trees at the Statue of Liberty   each feature is assigned a field idel1tification
             National Monument is used to indicate necessary preservation maintenance work   number.  An inspection is conducted to assess
             (Drawn by Margaret Coffin, 1992)                                 the condition, potential problems, such as
                                                                              deadwood or integral decay, al1d specify work
                                                                              needed.  A map (above) is used to locate features
                                                                              that require attention)




       18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20