Page 20 - maxson1928
P. 20

17.



                      The  region  of  the  skull  forward  of  the  premolar-molar  series  tends


            to  be  uniformly  narrow  t:tansversely  and  relatively  high  above  the  orbit.  The
            height  of  the  facial  region  is  a  primitive  character.  I~  is  definitely


            shown  to  b'e  present  by  e.  root  of  considerable  size.  Although  the  portion
                                                 2
            of  the  premaxilla  in  front  of  I- is  lacking  it  seems  quite  possiole  that
                       l                                    3
            a  small  1- was  present.  The  root  shows  I- to  be  a  large  tooth.  A  short
                                    3
            diastema  separates  I- from  the  slightly  smaller  canine  behind  it.  A long

            diastema  separates c!  from  P~.  The  latter  is  definitely  and  strongly
            two-rooted,  a  character  which Wortman  used  to  differentiate  Cope's  genus
                                          0 . .:
            11 Gomphotherium 11   from  Protla.bis.  Matthew  subsequently  regarded  the  former
            genus  as  insufficiently differentiated  from  Leidy's  genus  Protomer~x.
                                              1        2
            A short  diastema.  separates  P- from  P-.  The  premolars  have  undergone  great
            reduction  from  the  stage  represented  by  Poebrotherium  from  the  Vlhite  River


            Oligocene  and  a  noticeable  reduction  from  Paratylopus  from  the  John  Day.
            This  reduction  is  nearly  the  same  e.s  in Protolabis  but  less  than  in
                            l·                                    2         3
            Procamelu.s.  M- is  subquadrate  in  form  while  M-     and  M- tend  to  be  elongate.
            The  dentition  as  a  whole  is  sub-hypsodont.


                        The  small  size,  facial  proportions,  retention  of  incisors,  more
            qu.adrate  outline  of  molars,  and  less  hypsodont  dentition  separate  the


            specimen  from  Procamelus  and  later  forms.  Assigning  it to  Protolabis,
            Miolabis,  or  Paratylopus  is  more  difficult.  Miolabis  transmonte.nus  from


            the Mascall  of  centnal  Oregon  is  very  closely  related  to  the  species.
                       Protolabis  is  on  the  whole  more  advanced  in the  line  of  cameloid


            evolution.  Incisors  are  mu.ch  reduced  and.are  even  absent  in  a  specimen
            from  the  upper  horizon  of  the  Loup  Fork  beds  doubtfully  referred  to

                                                                      l              .
            P.  a.ngu.stidens.  Premolars  are  much  reduced  and  P- is  absent  in  one  species,
            P.  montanu.s.


                       Protolabis  heterodontus  although  similar  in  shape  is  much  larger.
            p!  is  subquadrate  while  the  molars  a.re  shorter  transversely  and  longer.


            Likewise  as  Wortman  pointed  out  Pl  is  definitely  a  single-rooted  tooth
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25