Page 17 - maxson1928
P. 17

/4,





                                         !.C.  intermontanus    M.  intermonte.nus  M.c.stylodontus
                                            (Mint  Canyon)


           Antero-poster:Lor  diameter  ----- a~10       ---------   i3.4 --------     23.4

           fJ.ransverse           II     ------ a25       -------- 24.8  -------       23.8
            1
           Height  ------- -      ------------     29   -------

           P- No.  30041  u.c.
             2
           Antero-posterior  diameter              21. ~'J  -------  21.2  ------- al8.5

           Transverse             fl     ------- 15.0  -------

           P- No.  30041  u.c.
             3
           Antero-posterior  diameter  ------ 21.0  -------- 20.4                      18.9

           '1ransverse              ft             17.0  ------- 14.2
            1


                        It would  appear  possible  on  the  basis  of  size  and  agreement  of

            characters  noted  ia the  dentition  to  assign  the  Mint  Canyon  form  to  the

           species  Merychippus  intermontanus.  '11he  similarity  of  this  Great  Basim

            form  to  the  Great  Plains  species  M.  sejunctus  and  Protohippus  perditus

           is  quite  interesting.  Matthew  (1915)  regards  the  former  as  pointing

           toward  the  latter  type.  M.  intermontanus  from  the  Barstow  and  also  the

           slightly  larger  form  from  the  Mint  Canyon  may  be  associated  with  the

            protohippine  stem  in which  case  it  is  possible  that  they  descended  from  a

           form  similar  tQ  :M.  sejunctus.  The  Mint  Canyon  ;,:::erychippus  intermontanus

           appproaches  very  closely  the  genus  Protohippus  and  possibly  should  be

           referred  to  it.


                                           PROTOHIPPUS?,  sp.



                       A  fourth  distinct  type  of  equine  yielded  by  the  Mint  Canyon

            series  is  represented  by  three  and  possibly  four  lower  cheek  teeth  (No.30041

           U.C.).  The  specimens  are  apparently  worn  and  considerably  weathered.  The

            teeth  are  definitel;r  hypaodont  and  the  crowns  are  heavily  cemented.  See

           Plate  I.  Fig.  6.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22